Academic
Publications
A Comparison of Commonwealth Accountability Standardized Test Scores Between High School Agricultural Education/Career and Technical Education Students and the Kentucky State Standards

A Comparison of Commonwealth Accountability Standardized Test Scores Between High School Agricultural Education/Career and Technical Education Student

A Comparison of Commonwealth Accountability Standardized Test Scores Between High School Agricultural Education/Career and Technical Education Students and the Kentucky State Standards   (Citations: 2)
BibTex | RIS | RefWorks Download
Throughout the history of education, assessment has been a crucial part of the teaching process. Various forms of assessment can "affect decisions about grades, advancement, placement, instructional needs, and curriculum" (Dietel, 1991). In Kentucky, the Board of Education designed the Commonwealth Accountability Testing System, or CATS, to assess its school programs. Each school has its own performance goal for every two-year period, ending in 2014. By 2014, the Board of Education hopes every school will receive a score of at least 100 out of 140. While scores can be evaluated by grade, they can also be evaluated by a number of other divisions, such as academic program. Scores in various areas can vary greatly depending on the student's curriculum choice. For example, students enrolled in an agriculture program may fare differently than those enrolled in communication classes in the areas of science, reading or mathematics. A study of these varying scores will not only improve student interest in certain educational programs, but also spotlight other programs that may need assistance in reformatting curriculum or teaching styles. Through a look at the CATS scores of Kentucky's high schools in 2003, the overall scores of agriculture students compared to those of non-agriculture students can determine the influence agricultural education has on the CATS test. By evaluating these scores by educational program, the CATS tests can be used to evaluate not just the curriculum of the subjects being tested over, but also the programs that contribute to learning these subjects. Through this evaluation, Kentucky's standardized tests can be used to their fullest potential by assessing curriculum and teaching styles, and in turn aiding in the advancement of education.
Cumulative Annual
View Publication
The following links allow you to view full publications. These links are maintained by other sources not affiliated with Microsoft Academic Search.
    • ...Though standardized tests may frustrate the student by challenging them with difficult questions, it also provides them with personal knowledge and skills that they possess (Woglom, Parr & Morgan, 2005)...
    • ...There are many different forms of the test making it impossible for the teachers to know all of the tests content (Woglom, Parr & Morgan, 2005)...

    Todd Shultzet al. Science, Math, Social Studies, and Language Arts Achievement of High S...

    • ...Not only is concern for achievement in the general population of students at a high level; but, specifically, the mathematics achievement of agricultural education students in at least one state has been found to be below the state average as well as below the level of other career and technical education concentrators (Woglom, Parr, & Morgan, 2005)...

    Brian A. Parret al. EFFECTS OF A MATH-ENHANCED CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTIONAL APPROACH ON TH...

Sort by: