Sign in
Author

Conference

Journal

Organization

Year

DOI
Look for results that meet for the following criteria:
since
equal to
before
between
and
Search in all fields of study
Limit my searches in the following fields of study
Agriculture Science
Arts & Humanities
Biology
Chemistry
Computer Science
Economics & Business
Engineering
Environmental Sciences
Geosciences
Material Science
Mathematics
Medicine
Physics
Social Science
Multidisciplinary
Keywords
(4)
Near Field
Numerical Integration
Plane Waves
Fourier Transform
Subscribe
Academic
Publications
Numerical evaluation of the Fresnel diffraction integrals
Numerical evaluation of the Fresnel diffraction integrals,Christine Adelle,L. Ricoand Mark,Nolan P. Confesor,A. Bonifacio
Edit
Numerical evaluation of the Fresnel diffraction integrals
BibTex

RIS

RefWorks
Download
Christine Adelle
,
L. Ricoand Mark
,
Nolan P. Confesor
,
A. Bonifacio
The simplest and most commonly described examples of diffraction and interference from two dimensional apertures are those for which the light incident on the apertures and the light passage through the apertures can be described as plane waves. In this limit the diffraction is described as Fraunhofer or farfield diffraction. If one of the aperture dimensions is very small compared to the other  an example would be a slit with a width small compared to its length  the intensity of the light transmitted through the aperture and observed some distance away will vary in a direction perpen dicualr to the slit width and the light beam, but will be constant in a direction along the slit. Thus the variation in the pattern can be described by only a single dimension and it is called onedimensional. Fraunhofer diffraction has a particularly simple mathematical description. The amplitude of the diffracted wave can be described as the
Fourier transform
of the aperture function (which is for a suitable aperture function is one that is a constant equal to 1 over the aperture and 0 elsewhere). It is, of course, the intensity that is observed. Because it is most convenient to treat the amplitude as a complex quantity, the intensity or irradiance is proportional to the amplitude times its complex conjugate. For many examples of diffraction, the light source and the point of observation are sufficiently far from the diffracting aperture that both the incident and diffracted light can be treated as plane waves. If these conditions are met, the diffraction is described as Fraunhofer or farfield diffraction. If the condition that the light source and point of observation are far from the diffracting aperture is not met, so that one cannot employ the approximation of plane waves, then the curvature of the wavefront must be considered in deriving the diffraction pattern. This diffraction is described as Fresnel or nearfield diffraction. The mathematics involved in Fresnel diffraction is not as simple as the Fourier transforms of the farfield diffraction. However, a description has been developed in terms of what are called Fresnel zones, that will yield understandable, qualitative results. If more quantitaive answers are needed, special integrals called Fresnel diffraction integrals must be evaluated. In this paper, the Fresnel diffraction integrals for apertures bounded by infinite straight line such as slits will be numerically evaluated. A simple
numerical integration
method for diffraction integrals to determine the scalar wave function as well as the irradiance, which is based on elementary geometrical considerations in which different portions of the incident wavefront contributes to the diffracted field, will also be presented.
Cumulative
Annual
View Publication
The following links allow you to view full publications. These links are maintained by other sources not affiliated with Microsoft Academic Search.
(
physics.msuiit.edu.ph
)
References
(1)
Algorithms for Fresnel Diffraction at Rectangular and Circular Apertures
(
Citations: 7
)
Klaus D. Mielenz
Published in 1998.