Academic
Publications
Small proportions: what to report for confidence intervals?

Small proportions: what to report for confidence intervals?,10.1002/pds.1081,Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety,Hilde Tobi,Paul B. van den Berg,Lolk

Small proportions: what to report for confidence intervals?   (Citations: 9)
BibTex | RIS | RefWorks Download
SUMMARY Purpose It is generally agreed that a confidence interval (CI) is usually more informative than a point estimate or p-value, but we rarely encounter small proportions with CI in the pharmacoepidemiological literature. When a CI is given it is sporadically reported, how it was calculated. This incorrectly suggests one single method to calculate CIs. To identify the method best suited for small proportions, seven approximate methods and the Clopper-Pearson Exact method to calculate CIs were compared. Methods In a simulation study for 90-, 95- and 99%CIs, with sample size 1000 and proportions ranging from 0.001 to 0.01, were evaluated systematically. Main quality criteria were coverage and interval width. The methods are illustrated using data from pharmacoepidemiology studies. Results Simulations showed that standard Wald methods have insufficient coverage probability regardless of how the desired coverage is perceived. Overall, the Exact method and the Score method with continuity correction (CC) performed best. Real life examples showed the methods to yield different results too. Conclusions For CIs for small proportions (� � 0.01), the use of the Exact method and the Score method with CC are advocated based on this study. Copyright # 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Journal: Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety - PHARMACOEPIDEMIOL DRUG SAF , vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 239-247, 2005
Cumulative Annual
View Publication
The following links allow you to view full publications. These links are maintained by other sources not affiliated with Microsoft Academic Search.
Sort by: