Author
|
Conference
|
Journal
|
Organization
|
Year
|
DOI
Look for results that meet for the following criteria:
since
equal to
before
between
and
Search in all domains
Limit my searches in the following domains
Agriculture Science
Arts & Humanities
Biology
Chemistry
Computer Science
Economics & Business
Engineering
Environmental Sciences
Geosciences
Material Science
Mathematics
Medicine
Physics
Social Science
Multidisciplinary
Keywords
(3)
Quantum System
State Space
1 dimensional
Subscribe
Academic
Publications
Sub–and super–fidelity as bounds for quantum fidelity
Edit
Sub–and super–fidelity as bounds for quantum fidelity
(
Citations: 10
)
BibTex
|
RIS
|
RefWorks
Download
J. A Miszczak
,
Z. Puchała
,
P. Horodecki
,
A. Uhlmann
,
K. Zyczkowski
We derive several bounds on fidelity between quantum states. In particular we show that fidelity is bounded from above by a simple to compute quantity we call super--fidelity. It is analogous to another quantity called sub--fidelity. For any two states of a two--dimensional
quantum system
(N=2) all three quantities coincide. We demonstrate that sub-- and super--fidelity are concave functions. We also show that super--fidelity is super--multiplicative while sub--fidelity is sub--multiplicative and design feasible schemes to measure these quantities in an experiment. Super--fidelity can be used to define a distance between quantum states. With respect to this metric the set of quantum states forms a part of a $N^2-1$ dimensional hypersphere.
Published in 2009.
Cumulative
Annual
View Publication
The following links allow you to view full publications. These links are maintained by other sources not affiliated with Microsoft Academic Search.
(
arxiv.org
)
(
www.iitis.gliwice.pl
)
Citation Context
(5)
...So, the sub-fidelity [
10
] and the super-fidelity [10,11] have been proposed as those measures that are easier to compute...
...So, the sub-fidelity [10] and the super-fidelity [
10
,11] have been proposed as those measures that are easier to compute...
Alexey E. Rastegin
.
Bounds on Shannon distinguishability in terms of partitioned measures
...The most interesting feature of the superfidelity is that it provides an upper bound for quantum fidelity [
14
]...
...It was also shown that it can be used to define such metrics on MN [
14
]a s...
...Itwas shown in Ref. [
14
] that quantities defined inEqs...
Zbigniew Puchała
,
et al.
Experimentally feasible measures of distance between quantum operation...
...There are many other bounds, older [19] and newer ones, [
22
, 23]...
Armin Uhlmann
.
Transition Probability (Fidelity) and Its Relatives
...Recently, the sub-fidelity [
12
] and the super-fidelity [12,13] have been studied...
...Recently, the sub-fidelity [12] and the super-fidelity [
12
,13] have been studied...
Alexey E. Rastegin
.
Partitioned trace distances
...In particular we concentrate on the bounds measurable on two copies of a state, i.e., those from Refs.[25,44,46],however,werecallalsotheresultof[43].Then,inSect.4weprovide yetanotherproofoftheMintert–Buchleitnerboundonconcurrence.Recentlyanalternative proof of the MB bound, based on the upper bound on Uhlmann–Jozsa fidelity [59,60]fromRef.[
61
],wasprovidedinRef.[62].Here,utilizingthenotionoftheconjugate function of concurrence, but also the ...
...[55–57] to derive measurable bounds on the entanglement measures from mean values of quantum observables) and the very recent upper bound on the fidelity [59,60] proved by Miszczak et al. [
61
]...
...We can utilize the aforementioned upper bound for the Ulhmann–Jozsa fidelity [59] defined as F(ρ1 ,ρ 2) = Tr � √ ρ1ρ2 √ ρ1. Namely, it was shown in Ref. [
61
] that the...
...In the case of the reduction map R some steps towards optimization can be made using the bound on fidelity [
61
], as it is pointed out in the paper...
Remigiusz Augusiakand
,
et al.
Towards measurable bounds on entanglement measures
References
(29)
The Metric of Bures and the Geometric Phase
(
Citations: 21
)
Armin Uhlmann
Published in 1992.
The scalar curvature of the Bures metric on the space of density matrices
(
Citations: 10
)
J. Dittmann
Journal:
Journal of Geometry and Physics - J GEOM PHYSICS
, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 16-24, 1999
Quantum computation and quantum information
(
Citations: 8992
)
M. A. Nielsen
,
I. L. Chuang
Published in 2000.
A note on the transition probability over C * -algebras
(
Citations: 14
)
Peter M. Alberti
,
Karl Marx
Journal:
Letters in Mathematical Physics - LETT MATH PHYS
, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 25-32, 1983
Majorisation with applications to the calculus of variations
(
Citations: 3
)
Marius Buliga
Journal:
Linear Algebra and Its Applications - LINEAR ALGEBRA APPL
, 2001
Order by:
Citations
(10)
Bounds on Shannon distinguishability in terms of partitioned measures
(
Citations: 3
)
Alexey E. Rastegin
Journal:
Quantum Information Processing - QUANTUM INF PROCESS
, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 123-138, 2011
Experimentally feasible measures of distance between quantum operations
(
Citations: 1
)
Zbigniew Puchała
,
Jarosław Adam Miszczak
,
Piotr Gawron
,
Bartłomiej Gardas
Journal:
Quantum Information Processing - QUANTUM INF PROCESS
, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1-12, 2011
Completely bounded norms of right module maps
Rupert H. Levene
,
Richard M. Timoney
Journal:
Linear Algebra and Its Applications - LINEAR ALGEBRA APPL
, 2011
Transition Probability (Fidelity) and Its Relatives
Armin Uhlmann
Journal:
Foundations of Physics - FOUND PHYS
, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 288-298, 2011
Partitioned trace distances
(
Citations: 6
)
Alexey E. Rastegin
Journal:
Quantum Information Processing - QUANTUM INF PROCESS
, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 61-73, 2010