Author
|
Conference
|
Journal
|
Organization
|
Year
|
DOI
Look for results that meet for the following criteria:
since
equal to
before
between
and
Search in all domains
Limit my searches in the following domains
Agriculture Science
Arts & Humanities
Biology
Chemistry
Computer Science
Economics & Business
Engineering
Environmental Sciences
Geosciences
Material Science
Mathematics
Medicine
Physics
Social Science
Multidisciplinary
Keywords
(10)
Elementary Education
Elementary School
Evaluation Methodology
Interactive Learning Environment
Lessons Learned
Parent Involvement
Participatory Design
Shared Space
Test Bed
Theoretical Foundation
Subscribe
Academic
Publications
Technology to support parental engagement in elementary education: Lessons learned from the UK
Edit
Technology to support parental engagement in elementary education: Lessons learned from the UK
(
Citations: 4
)
BibTex
|
RIS
|
RefWorks
Download
Cathy Lewin
,
Rosemary Luckin
This paper compares and contrasts two projects in order to better understand the complex issues surrounding the use of technology to support parental involvement with schools and their children’s learning. The Becta-funded ICT
Test Bed
evaluation (2002–2006) had the intention of saturating schools (in three areas of social deprivation) with a range of technologies, including 23 elementary schools. The ESRC/EPSRC/DTI-funded Homework project (2003–2006) used
participatory design
methods to develop and evaluate technology to link home and school in a
elementary school
in the South East. Both projects shared a common theoretical foundation, that of socio-cultural theory. The theory influenced the
evaluation methodology
employed in both projects and in the Homework project it additionally influenced the design of the technology intervention. Findings suggest that technologies with readily accessible and interactive resources that are flexible can help develop parental engagement. However, simpler and less resource hungry solutions such as the use of websites and email can provide opportunities for quick wins. In relation to transporting technology between home and school, there are issues for both staff and parents. Without purposeful use, these challenges act as a barrier once they outweigh the novelty effect. We conclude that parental needs are complex and that engagement needs to be sensitively scaffolded rather than focussing on the technology.
Participatory design
offers an effective means of addressing this and should be the starting point. The technology should facilitate independence and mediate access to a
shared space
for collaborative activity. The content and guidance needs to be purposeful and relevant, offering a means to integrate learning across the learner’s broader context, including school and home seamlessly.
Journal:
Computers & Education
, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 749-758, 2010
DOI:
10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.010
Cumulative
Annual
View Publication
The following links allow you to view full publications. These links are maintained by other sources not affiliated with Microsoft Academic Search.
(
www.sciencedirect.com
)
(
linkinghub.elsevier.com
)
(
dx.doi.org
)
(
www.informatik.uni-trier.de
)
More »
Citation Context
(2)
...It is very technologically deterministic (MacKenzie and Wajcman 1999,
Lewin & Luckin 2010
) in its approach to ICT and the success which, it maintains, ICT will bring to parent – teacher communication...
...Researching parents‘ involvement in their children‘s learning through the use of the ICT,
Lewin and Luckin (2010)
report on the initial positive but short term outcome...
Eva Turner
.
Technology use in reporting to parents of primary school children
...Evidence suggests that active parental involvement is associated with improvement in overall academic outcomes (
Lewin and Luckin 2010
) and increased math and reading scores (Turney and Kao 2009), as well as being a protective factor for school engagement in both elementary school and secondary schools (Jeynes 2003)...
Kimberly BenderDaniel Brisson
,
et al.
Challenges and Strategies for Conducting Program-Based Research in Aft...
References
(8)
Children and young people’s uses of the Internet for homework
(
Citations: 3
)
Sue Cranmer
Journal:
Learning, Media and Technology
, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 301-315, 2006
The Impact of Parental Involvement, Parental Support and Family Education on Pupil Achievements and Adjustment: A Literature Review
(
Citations: 47
)
Charles Desforges
Do parents know they matter? Engaging all parents in learning
(
Citations: 6
)
Alma Harris
,
Janet Goodall
Journal:
Educational Research - EDUC RES
, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 277-289, 2008
From promises to practices: the fate of educational software in the home
(
Citations: 2
)
Lucinda Kerawalla
,
Charles Crook
Journal:
Technology, Pedagogy and Education
, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 107-125, 2005
Ecolab: The Development and Evaluation of a Vygotskian Design Framework
(
Citations: 45
)
Rosemary Luckin
Published in 1999.
Order by:
Citations
(4)
Technology use in reporting to parents of primary school children
(
Citations: 1
)
Eva Turner
Published in 2010.
Socioculture and Cognitivist Perspectives on Language and Communication Barriers in Learning
David Hallberg
Published in 2010.
Socioculture and Cognitivist Perspectives on Language and Communication Barriers in Learning
David Hallberg
Published in 2009.
Challenges and Strategies for Conducting Program-Based Research in After-School Settings
Kimberly BenderDaniel Brisson
,
Daniel Brisson
,
Jeffrey M. Jenson
,
Shandra Forrest-Bank
,
Amy Lopez
,
Jamie Yoder