Academic
Publications
Medical examiner and medical toxicologist agreement on cause of death

Medical examiner and medical toxicologist agreement on cause of death,10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.06.021,Forensic Science International,Alex F. Manini,Le

Medical examiner and medical toxicologist agreement on cause of death   (Citations: 1)
BibTex | RIS | RefWorks Download
Poisoning is a significant public health threat as the second leading cause of injury-related death in the US. Disagreements on cause of death determination may have widespread implications across several realms of public health including policy and prevention efforts, interpretation of the poisoning literature, epidemiologic data analysis, medical-legal case outcomes, and individualized autopsy interpretation. We aimed to test agreement between the cause of death determined by the medical examiner (ME) and a medical toxicologist (MT) adjudication panel (MTAP) in cases of poisoning. This retrospective 7-year study evaluated all deaths attributed to poisoning in one large urban catchment area. Cross-matched data were obtained from Department of Vital Statistics and the Poison Control Center (PCC). Out of >380,000 deaths in the catchment area over the study period, there were 7050 poisonings in the Vital Statistics database and 414 deaths reported to PCC. Cross-matching yielded 321 cases for analysis. The ME and MTAP concurred on cause of death in 66%, which was only fair agreement (κ 0.25, CI 0.14–0.38). Factors associated with the likelihood of agreement were peri-mortem fire exposures, prehospital cardiac arrest, and timing of drug toxicity (chronic versus acute). In conclusion, agreement for poisoning cause of death between specialties was much lower than expected. We recommend an improved formal process of information sharing and consultation between specialties to assure that all existing information is analyzed thoroughly to enhance cause of death certainty.
Journal: Forensic Science International - FORENSIC SCI INT , vol. 206, no. 1, pp. 71-76, 2011
Cumulative Annual
View Publication
The following links allow you to view full publications. These links are maintained by other sources not affiliated with Microsoft Academic Search.
    • ...Most cases were categorised by reviewing the coronial documents mentioned above. Specific key points of reference included cause of death statements and descriptive comments in autopsy reports (where available), and/or coroners' determinations. Thirty-two cases were referred to a panel in order to canvas a wider expert opinion on appropriate categorisation. In some cases this may have been where autopsies were not conducted because of a request from the next of kin. In other instances the pathologist did not mention the contribution of drugs to the cause of death, despite the presence of potentially lethal levels reported in toxicology results. Discordance in opinion between forensic toxicologists and pathologists in establishing a cause of death in cases involving poisoning has been reported in the USA....

    Angela C Rintoulet al. Increasing deaths involving oxycodone, Victoria, Australia, 2000–09

Sort by: