Sign in
Author
|
Conference
|
Journal
|
Organization
|
Year
|
DOI
Look for results that meet for the following criteria:
since
equal to
before
between
and
Search in all fields of study
Limit my searches in the following fields of study
Agriculture Science
Arts & Humanities
Biology
Chemistry
Computer Science
Economics & Business
Engineering
Environmental Sciences
Geosciences
Material Science
Mathematics
Medicine
Physics
Social Science
Multidisciplinary
Keywords
(4)
Age Difference
Factor Structure
Psychometric Properties
Young Adult
Subscribe
Academic
Publications
Can Alexithymia Be Assessed in Adolescents? Psychometric Properties of the 20Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale in Younger, Middle, and Older Adolescents
Can Alexithymia Be Assessed in Adolescents? Psychometric Properties of the 20Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale in Younger, Middle, and Older Adolescents,
Edit
Can Alexithymia Be Assessed in Adolescents? Psychometric Properties of the 20Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale in Younger, Middle, and Older Adolescents
BibTex
|
RIS
|
RefWorks
Download
James D. A. Parker
,
Jennifer M. Eastabrook
,
Kateryna V. Keefer
,
Laura M. Wood
The 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20; Bagby, Parker, & Taylor, 1994; Bagby, Taylor, & Parker, 1994) is the most widely used self-report measure of the alexithymia construct. The TAS-20 comprises 3 factors that assess difficulty identifying feelings, difficulty describing feelings, and externally oriented thinking. Although the instrument is being increasingly used with adolescent respondents, the
psychometric properties
of the TAS-20 have not been systematically evaluated in preadult populations. In the present study, we examined measurement invariance of the factor structure, internal reliability, and mean levels of responses on the TAS-20 in groups of younger adolescents (aged 13–14 years), middle adolescents (aged 15–16 years), and older adolescents (aged 17–18 years), as well as in a comparison group of young adults (aged 19–21 years). Formal readability analysis of the TAS-20 assessment was also conducted. Results revealed systematic age differences in the
factor structure
and
psychometric properties
of the TAS-20, with the quality of measurement progressively deteriorating with younger age. Much of this effect could be attributed to the reading difficulty of the scale. The use of the TAS-20 with teenage respondents is not recommended without appropriate adaptation and further psychometric validation. Several adaptation strategies are discussed.
Journal:
Psychological Assessment - PSYCHOL ASSESSMENT
, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 798-808, 2010
DOI:
10.1037/a0020256
Cumulative
Annual
View Publication
The following links allow you to view full publications. These links are maintained by other sources not affiliated with Microsoft Academic Search.
(
doi.apa.org
)
(
dx.doi.org
)
References
(4)
Readability revisited: the new Dale-Chall readability formula
(
Citations: 103
)
J. S. Chall
,
E. Dale
Published in 1995.
Structural Equations Modeling
(
Citations: 1041
)
Richard Netemeyer
,
Peter Bentler
,
Richard Bagozzi
,
Robert Cudeck
,
Joseph Cote
,
Donald Lehmann
,
Roderick McDonald
,
Timothy Heath
,
Julie Irwin
,
Tim Ambler
Journal:
Journal of Consumer Psychology - J CONSUM PSYCHOL
, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 83-100, 2001
Derivation of new readability formulas for navy enlisted personnel
(
Citations: 42
)
J. P. Kincaid
,
R. P. Fishburn
,
B. S. Chissom
Published in 1975.
The measurement of readability
(
Citations: 107
)
George R. Klare
Published in 1963.