Sign in
Author
|
Conference
|
Journal
|
Organization
|
Year
|
DOI
Look for results that meet for the following criteria:
since
equal to
before
between
and
Search in all fields of study
Limit my searches in the following fields of study
Agriculture Science
Arts & Humanities
Biology
Chemistry
Computer Science
Economics & Business
Engineering
Environmental Sciences
Geosciences
Material Science
Mathematics
Medicine
Physics
Social Science
Multidisciplinary
Keywords
(5)
Computer Mediated Communication
Field Experiment
New Technology
Virtual Team
Face To Face
Subscribe
Academic
Publications
Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words?Photographic Images in Long-Term and Short-Term Computer-Mediated Communication
Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words?Photographic Images in Long-Term and Short-Term Computer-Mediated Communication,10.1177/009365001028001004,Communi
Edit
Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words?Photographic Images in Long-Term and Short-Term Computer-Mediated Communication
(
Citations: 72
)
BibTex
|
RIS
|
RefWorks
Download
JOSEPH B. WALTHER
,
CELESTE L. SLOVACEK
,
LISA C. TIDWELL
This article asks whether, and when, participants benefit from seeing each other's faces in computer-mediated communication. Although new technologies make it relatively easy to exchange images over the Internet, our formal understanding of their impacts is not clear. Some theories suggest that the more one can see of one's partners, the better one will like them. Others suggest that long-term
virtual team
members may like each other better than would those who use face-to-face interaction. The dynamic underlying this latter effect may also pertain to the presentation of realistic images compared with idealized virtual perceptions. A
field experiment
evaluated the timing of physical image presentations for members of short-term and long-term virtual, international groups. Results indicate that in new, unacquainted teams, seeing one's partner promotes affection and social attraction, but in long-term online groups, the same type of photograph dampens affinity.
Journal:
Communication Research - COMMUN RES
, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 105-134, 2001
DOI:
10.1177/009365001028001004
Cumulative
Annual
View Publication
The following links allow you to view full publications. These links are maintained by other sources not affiliated with Microsoft Academic Search.
(
dx.doi.org
)
(
crx.sagepub.com
)
Citation Context
(21)
...According to some researchers (Collins & Miller,
1994
; Leow & Wang,
2010
; Tanis,
2007
; Walther, Slovacek, & Tidwell,
2001
), individuals tend to accept other people who are similar to themselves (eg, interest, gender) and the absence of non-verbal cues may increase the individuals' perceived similarity of other people to themselves, hence creating a bonding effect between two individuals who may not know each other...
Khe Foon Hew
,
et al.
Use of Facebook: a case study of Singapore students' experience
...This idea is consistent with previous work suggesting that photos can increase initial positive attitudes towards others in a cue-impoverished, computer-mediated environment [1,
11
]...
Jennifer Marlow
,
et al.
Photo sharing in diverse distributed teams
...
(2001)
research that suggest that learning names and pictures of online interaction partners decreases the influence of social norms, particularly in long-term groups...
Anita L. Blanchard
,
et al.
A MODEL OF ONLINE TRUST
...Hyperpersonal CMC takes this further in which individuals who communicate online can “exploit the capabilities of text-based, nonvisual interaction to form levels of affinity that would be unexpected in parallel offline interactions” (Walther, Slovacek, & Tidwell,
2001
, p...
Tanya Kang
,
et al.
Why Would You Decide to Use an Online Dating Site? Factors That Lead t...
...Scale for EN is partly based on [18]; for SP is partly based on [
23
]; *Difference is not significant;...
Hanna Krasnova
,
et al.
Privacy Calculus on Social Networking Sites: Explorative Evidence from...
References
(20)
The communication of friendly and hostile attitudes by verbal and non-verbal signals
(
Citations: 46
)
Michael Argyle
,
Florisse Alkema
,
Robin Gilmour
Journal:
European Journal of Social Psychology - EUR J SOC PSYCHOL
, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 385-402, 1971
Studies in interpersonal epistemology: III. Anticipated interaction, self‐monitoring, and observational context selection
(
Citations: 45
)
Charles R. Berger
,
William Douglas
Journal:
Communication Monographs - COMMUN MONOGR
, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 183-196, 1981
Relational Development in Computer-Supported Groups
(
Citations: 193
)
Laku Chidambaram
Journal:
Management Information Systems Quarterly - MISQ
, vol. 20, no. 2, 1996
Experiments in Group Decision Making Communication Process and Outcome in Face-to-Face Versus Computerized Conferences
(
Citations: 248
)
STARR ROXANNE HILTZ
,
KENNETH JOHNSON
,
MURRAY TUROFF
Journal:
Human Communication Research - HUM COMMUN RES
, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 225-252, 1986
Impression Formation in Cyberspace: Online Expectations and Offline Experiences in Text-based Virtual Communities
(
Citations: 45
)
David Jacobson
Journal:
Journal of Computer-mediated Communication - JCMC
, vol. 5, no. 1, 1999
Sort by:
Citations
(72)
Use of Facebook: a case study of Singapore students' experience
Khe Foon Hew
,
Wing Sum Cheung
Journal:
Asia Pacific Journal of Education - ASIA PAC J EDUC
, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 181-196, 2012
Photo sharing in diverse distributed teams
Jennifer Marlow
,
Laura Dabbish
Conference:
Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work - CSCW
, pp. 317-320, 2011
A MODEL OF ONLINE TRUST
Anita L. Blanchard
,
Jennifer L. Welbourne
,
Marla D. Boughton
Journal:
Information, Communication & Society
, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 76-106, 2011
Why Would You Decide to Use an Online Dating Site? Factors That Lead to Online Dating
Tanya Kang
,
Lindsay H. Hoffman
Journal:
Communication Research Reports
, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 205-213, 2011
Face off: Implications of visual cues on initiating friendship on Facebook
(
Citations: 3
)
Shaojung Sharon Wang
,
Shin-Il Moon
,
Kyounghee Hazel Kwon
,
Carolyn A. Evans
,
Michael A. Stefanone
Journal:
Computers in Human Behavior - COMPUT HUM BEHAV
, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 226-234, 2010