Academic
Publications
Safety Measures During Cholecystectomy: Results of a Nationwide Survey

Safety Measures During Cholecystectomy: Results of a Nationwide Survey,10.1007/s00268-011-1061-3,World Journal of Surgery,K. T. Buddingh,H. S. Hofker,

Safety Measures During Cholecystectomy: Results of a Nationwide Survey   (Citations: 3)
BibTex | RIS | RefWorks Download
Background  This study aimed to identify safety measures practiced by Dutch surgeons during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Method  An electronic questionnaire was sent to all members of the Dutch Society of Surgery with a registered e-mail address. Results  The response rate was 40.4% and 453 responses were analyzed. The distribution of the respondents with regard to type of hospital was similar to that in the general population of Dutch surgeons. The critical view of safety (CVS) technique is used by 97.6% of the surgeons. It is documented by 92.6%, mostly in the operation report (80.0%), but often augmented by photography (42.7%) or video (30.2%). If the CVS is not obtained, 50.9% of surgeons convert to the open approach, 39.1% continue laparoscopically, and 10.0% perform additional imaging studies. Of Dutch surgeons, 53.2% never perform intraoperative cholangiography (IOC), 41.3% perform it incidentally, and only 2.6% perform it routinely. A total of 105 bile duct injuries (BDIs) were reported in 14,387 cholecystectomies (0.73%). The self-reported major BDI rate (involving the common bile duct) was 0.13%, but these figures need to be confirmed in other studies. Conclusion  The CVS approach in laparoscopic cholecystectomy is embraced by virtually all Dutch surgeons. The course of action when CVS is not obtained varies. IOC seems to be an endangered skill as over half the Dutch surgeons never perform it and the rest perform it only incidentally.
Journal: World Journal of Surgery - WORLD J SURGERY , vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1235-1241, 2011
Cumulative Annual
View Publication
The following links allow you to view full publications. These links are maintained by other sources not affiliated with Microsoft Academic Search.
Sort by: