Sign in
Author
|
Conference
|
Journal
|
Organization
|
Year
|
DOI
Look for results that meet for the following criteria:
since
equal to
before
between
and
Search in all fields of study
Limit my searches in the following fields of study
Agriculture Science
Arts & Humanities
Biology
Chemistry
Computer Science
Economics & Business
Engineering
Environmental Sciences
Geosciences
Material Science
Mathematics
Medicine
Physics
Social Science
Multidisciplinary
Keywords
(3)
Biological Diversity
Scientific Communication
South America
Subscribe
Academic
Publications
Insights from Zootaxa on potential trends in zoological taxonomic activity
Insights from Zootaxa on potential trends in zoological taxonomic activity,10.1186/1742-9994-8-5,Frontiers in Zoology,Elise Tancoigne,Cyprien Bole,Ann
Edit
Insights from Zootaxa on potential trends in zoological taxonomic activity
BibTex
|
RIS
|
RefWorks
Download
Elise Tancoigne
,
Cyprien Bole
,
Anne Sigogneau
,
Alain Dubois
Background An opinion currently shared by taxonomists and non taxonomists alike is that the work of inventorying biodiversity is unbalanced: firstly, in favour of countries in which taxonomy has been studied for a long time, and, secondly, in favour of vertebrates. In the current context of threats of species extinction, access for taxonomists to biological material and information becomes crucial if the scientific community really aims at a better knowledge of
biological diversity
before it is severely and irreversibly impoverished. We performed an analysis of 748 papers published in Zootaxa in 2006 and 2007, as well as 434 questionnaires sent to their authors to test these opinions. A generalization of these results to zoological taxonomy as a whole is discussed. Discussion We found that the disequilibrium is not exactly what it usually considered to be. The USA, China and Brazil are currently the three leading countries in zoological taxonomy. Each of them presents, however, a different pattern. Taxonomists from Asia and
South America
are younger and mainly work in universities, not museums. A bias in favour of vertebrates still exists if we refer to the effort invested in each group to produce taxonomic data, but not to the number of papers. Finally, we insist on the idea that "describing a species" is very different from "knowing a species". Summary The taxonomic involvement of a country, in terms of manpower and funding, appears to be a key factor in the development of fruitful taxonomic research. This message seems to have been understood by the countries that recently decided to increase considerably their taxonomic involvement. It still has to be received by those who did not.
Journal:
Frontiers in Zoology - FRONT ZOOL
, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1-13, 2011
DOI:
10.1186/1742-9994-8-5
Cumulative
Annual
View Publication
The following links allow you to view full publications. These links are maintained by other sources not affiliated with Microsoft Academic Search.
(
www.springerlink.com
)
(
www.springerlink.com
)
References
(18)
The (bio)diversity of science reflects the interests of society
(
Citations: 10
)
John RU Wilson
,
Şerban Procheş
,
Brigitte Braschler
,
Edd S Dixon
,
David M Richardson
Journal:
Frontiers in Ecology and The Environment - FRONT ECOL ENVIRON
, vol. 5, no. 8, 2007
Organismal complexity is an indicator of species existence value
(
Citations: 3
)
Vânia M Proença
,
Henrique Miguel Pereira
,
Luís Vicente
Journal:
Frontiers in Ecology and The Environment - FRONT ECOL ENVIRON
, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 298-299, 2008
Living on the edge: parasite taxonomy in Australia
(
Citations: 2
)
T. H. Cribb
Journal:
International Journal for Parasitology - INT J PARASITOL
, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 117-123, 2004
Taxonomic chauvinism
(
Citations: 34
)
Xavier Bonnet
,
Richard Shine
,
Olivier Lourdais
Journal:
Trends in Ecology and Evolution
, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1-3, 2002
Demography of Coleopterists and Their Thoughts on DNA Barcoding and the Phylocode, with Commentary
(
Citations: 4
)
Ivan Löbl
,
Richard A. B. Leschen
Journal:
Coleopterists Bulletin - COLEOPTS BULL
, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 284-292, 2005