Academic
Publications
Physician Groups’ Use of Data from Patient Experience Surveys

Physician Groups’ Use of Data from Patient Experience Surveys,10.1007/s11606-010-1597-1,Journal of General Internal Medicine,Mark W. Friedberg,Gillian

Physician Groups’ Use of Data from Patient Experience Surveys   (Citations: 1)
BibTex | RIS | RefWorks Download
Background  In Massachusetts, physician groups’ performance on validated surveys of patient experience has been publicly reported since 2006. Groups also receive detailed reports of their own performance, but little is known about how physician groups have responded to these reports. Objective  To examine whether and how physician groups are using patient experience data to improve patient care. Design and Participants  During 2008, we conducted semi-structured interviews with the leaders of 72 participating physician groups (out of 117 groups receiving patient experience reports). Based on leaders’ responses, we identified three levels of engagement with patient experience reporting: no efforts to improve (level 1), efforts to improve only the performance of low-scoring physicians or practice sites (level 2), and efforts to improve group-wide performance (level 3). Main Measures  Groups’ level of engagement and specific efforts to improve patient care. Key Results  Forty-four group leaders (61%) reported group-wide improvement efforts (level 3), 16 (22%) reported efforts to improve only the performance of low-scoring physicians or practice sites (level 2), and 12 (17%) reported no performance improvement efforts (level 1). Level 3 groups were more likely than others to have an integrated medical group organizational model (84% vs. 31% at level 2 and 33% at level 1; P P < 0.05). Among level 3 groups, the most common targets for improvement were access, communication with patients, and customer service. The most commonly reported improvement initiatives were changing office workflow, providing additional training for nonclinical staff, and adopting or enhancing an electronic health record. Conclusions  Despite statewide public reporting, physician groups’ use of patient experience data varied widely. Integrated organizational models were associated with greater engagement, and efforts to enhance clinicians’ interpersonal skills were uncommon, with groups predominantly focusing on office workflow and support staff.
Journal: Journal of General Internal Medicine - J GEN INTERN MED , vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 498-504, 2011
Cumulative Annual
View Publication
The following links allow you to view full publications. These links are maintained by other sources not affiliated with Microsoft Academic Search.
Sort by: