Sign in
Author
|
Conference
|
Journal
|
Organization
|
Year
|
DOI
Look for results that meet for the following criteria:
since
equal to
before
between
and
Search in all fields of study
Limit my searches in the following fields of study
Agriculture Science
Arts & Humanities
Biology
Chemistry
Computer Science
Economics & Business
Engineering
Environmental Sciences
Geosciences
Material Science
Mathematics
Medicine
Physics
Social Science
Multidisciplinary
Keywords
(14)
Background Radiation
Dose Response
Epidemiologic Studies
Model Averaging
Model Development
Model Uncertainty
Radiation Dose
Radiation Protection
Risk Assessment
Statistical Significance
Statistical Test
United Nations
Excess Relative Risk
Low Dose
Subscribe
Academic
Publications
Multi-model inference of adult and childhood leukaemia excess relative risks based on the Japanese A-bomb survivors mortality data (1950–2000)
Multi-model inference of adult and childhood leukaemia excess relative risks based on the Japanese A-bomb survivors mortality data (1950–2000),10.1007
Edit
Multi-model inference of adult and childhood leukaemia excess relative risks based on the Japanese A-bomb survivors mortality data (1950–2000)
BibTex
|
RIS
|
RefWorks
Download
Linda WalshJan
,
Jan Christian Kaiser
Some relatively new issues that augment the usual practice of ignoring model uncertainty, when making inference about parameters of a specific model, are brought to the attention of the
radiation protection
community here. Nine recently published leukaemia risk models, developed with the Japanese A-bomb epidemiological mortality data, have been included in a model-averaging procedure so that the main conclusions do not depend on just one type of model or statistical test. The models have been centred here at various adult and young ages at exposure, for some short times since exposure, in order to obtain specially computed childhood Excess Relative Risks (ERR) with uncertainties that account for correlations in the fitted parameters associated with the ERR dose–response. The model-averaged ERR at 1 Sv was not found to be statistically significant for attained ages of 7 and 12 years but was statistically significant for attained ages of 17, 22 and 55 years. Consequently, such risks when applied to other situations, such as children in the vicinity of nuclear installations or in estimates of the proportion of childhood leukaemia incidence attributable to
background radiation
(i.e. low doses for young ages and short times since exposure), are only of very limited value, with uncertainty ranges that include zero risk. For example, assuming a total
radiation dose
to a 5-year-old child of 10 mSv and applying the model-averaged risk at 10 mSv for a 7-year-old exposed at 2 years of age would result in an ERR = 0.33, 95% CI: −0.51 to 1.22. One model (United Nations scientific committee on the effects of atomic radiation report. Volume 1. Annex A: epidemiological studies of radiation and cancer, United Nations, New York, 2006) weighted model-averaged risks of leukaemia most strongly by half of the total unity weighting and is recommended for application in future leukaemia risk assessments that continue to ignore model uncertainty. However, on the basis of the analysis presented here, it is generally recommended to take
model uncertainty
into account in future risk analyses.
Journal:
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics - RADIAT ENVIRON BIOPHYS
, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 21-35, 2011
DOI:
10.1007/s00411-010-0337-6
Cumulative
Annual
View Publication
The following links allow you to view full publications. These links are maintained by other sources not affiliated with Microsoft Academic Search.
(
www.springerlink.com
)
(
www.springerlink.com
)
References
(19)
A new look at the statistical model identification
(
Citations: 8442
)
H. Akaike
Journal:
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control - IEEE TRANS AUTOMAT CONTR
, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 716-723, 1974
Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach
(
Citations: 1904
)
K. P. Burnham
,
D. R. Anderson
Published in 1998.
Model selection and multi-model inference
(
Citations: 518
)
K. P. Burhnam
,
D. R. Anderson
Published in 2002.
Multimodel Inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in Model Selection
(
Citations: 471
)
K. P. Burnham
Journal:
Sociological Methods & Research - SOCIOL METHOD RES
, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 261-304, 2004
Risk of cancer after low doses of ionising radiation: retrospective cohort study in 15 countries
(
Citations: 125
)
E Cardis
,
M Vrijheid
,
M Blettner
,
E Gilbert
,
M Hakama
,
C Hill
,
G Howe
,
J Kaldor
,
C R Muirhead
,
T Yoshimura
,
F Bermann
,
G Cowper
http://academic.research.microsoft.com/io.ashx?type=5&id=6564799&selfId1=0&selfId2=0&maxNumber=12&query=
Journal:
British Medical Journal - BMJ
, vol. 331, no. 7508, pp. 77-0, 2005