Proof-theoretic semantics for a natural language fragment
(Citations: 2)
The paper presents a proof-theoretic semantics (PTS) for a fragment of natural language, providing an alternative to the traditional
model-theoretic (Montagovian) semantics (MTS), whereby meanings are truth-condition (in arbitrary models). Instead, meanings
are taken as derivability-conditions in a “dedicated” natural-deduction (ND) proof-system. This semantics is effective (algorithmically
decidable), adhering to the “meaning as use” paradigm, not suffering from several of the criticisms formulated by philosophers
of language against MTS as a theory of meaning. In particular, Dummett’s manifestation argument does not obtain, and assertions
are always warranted, having grounds of assertion. The proof system is shown to satisfy Dummett’s harmony property, justifying
the ND rules as meaning conferring. The semantics is suitable for incorporation into computational linguistics grammars, formulated
in type-logical grammar.