A pseudo-waveform technique to assess forest structure using discrete lidar data

A pseudo-waveform technique to assess forest structure using discrete lidar data,10.1016/j.rse.2010.11.008,Remote Sensing of Environment,Jordan D. Mus

A pseudo-waveform technique to assess forest structure using discrete lidar data  
BibTex | RIS | RefWorks Download
The use of airborne laser scanning systems (lidar) to describe forest structure has increased dramatically since height profiling experiments nearly 30years ago. The analyses in most studies employ a suite of frequency-based metrics calculated from the lidar height data, which are systematically eliminated from a full model using stepwise multiple linear regression. The resulting models often include highly correlated predictors with little physical justification for model formulation. We propose a method to aggregate discrete lidar height and intensity measurements into larger footprints to create “pseudo-waves”. Specifically, the returns are first sorted into height bins, sliced into narrow discrete elements, and finally smoothed using a spline function. The resulting “pseudo-waves” have many of the same characteristics of traditional waveform lidar data. We compared our method to a traditional frequency-based method to estimate tree height, canopy structure, stem density, and stand biomass in coniferous and deciduous stands in northern Wisconsin (USA). We found that the pseudo-wave approach had strong correlations for nearly all tree measurements including height (cross validated adjusted R2 (R2cv)=0.82, RMSEcv=2.09m), mean stem diameter (R2cv=0.64, RMSEcv=6.15cm), total aboveground biomass (R2cv=0.74, RMSEcv=74.03kgha−1), and canopy coverage (R2cv=0.79, RMSEcv=5%). Moreover, the type of wave (derived from height and intensity or from height alone) had little effect on model formulation and fit. When wave-based and frequency-based models were compared, fit and mean square error were comparable, leading us to conclude that the pseudo-wave approach is a viable alternative because it has 1) an increased breadth of available metrics; 2) the potential to establish new meaningful metrics that capture unique patterns within the waves; 3) the ability to explain metric selection based on the physical structure of forests; and 4) lower correlation among independent variables.
Journal: Remote Sensing of Environment - REMOTE SENS ENVIRON , vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 824-835, 2011
Cumulative Annual
View Publication
The following links allow you to view full publications. These links are maintained by other sources not affiliated with Microsoft Academic Search.