Sign in
Author
|
Conference
|
Journal
|
Organization
|
Year
|
DOI
Look for results that meet for the following criteria:
since
equal to
before
between
and
Search in all fields of study
Limit my searches in the following fields of study
Agriculture Science
Arts & Humanities
Biology
Chemistry
Computer Science
Economics & Business
Engineering
Environmental Sciences
Geosciences
Material Science
Mathematics
Medicine
Physics
Social Science
Multidisciplinary
Keywords
(16)
Climate Warming
Collective Action
Ecosystem Processes
Endangered Species Act
Indigenous Communities
Polar Bear
Policy Design
Policy Implementation
Policy Making
Population Dynamic
Sea Ice
Social Change
Social Ecological System
System Approach
Temporal Scale
ursus maritimus
Subscribe
Academic
Publications
Putting the US polar bear debate into context: The disconnect between old policy and new problems
Putting the US polar bear debate into context: The disconnect between old policy and new problems,10.1016/j.marpol.2010.11.005,Marine Policy,Chanda L.
Edit
Putting the US polar bear debate into context: The disconnect between old policy and new problems
BibTex
|
RIS
|
RefWorks
Download
Chanda L. Meek
Rapid ecological and
social change
in the Arctic challenge conventional methods of policy analyses and prescriptions. This is especially true for the conservation of ice-dependent species as
climate warming
has reduced
sea ice
cover. Polar bears are an interesting case to examine, as they are subject to a bundle of institutions, many of which cross scales and have in the past resulted in successful collective action. However, key policies such as the US
Endangered Species
Act, premised on mediating short-term disturbances, may not fit new problems that cross geographic and temporal scales and require the conservation of slow
ecosystem processes
such as oceanographic conditions or
sea ice
habitats. In this case, it is argued that the American
polar bear
regime as it has evolved no longer fits contemporary social–ecological dynamics. Through an analysis of the scale, efficacy and feasibility of individual policies making up the regime, the current bundle of policies are evaluated against a model of social–ecological system dynamics. The results indicate that the regime has increased its geographic scale to match population dynamics, but has focused on short-term disturbance over long-term resilience and is characterized by trade-offs between efficacy and feasibility. The equity of these trade-offs for
indigenous communities
that live with bears as part of a social–ecological system is highlighted. To address resilience and issues of equity, a systems approach to
policy design
and evaluation is recommended.
Journal:
Marine Policy - MAR POLICY
, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 430-439, 2011
DOI:
10.1016/j.marpol.2010.11.005
Cumulative
Annual
View Publication
The following links allow you to view full publications. These links are maintained by other sources not affiliated with Microsoft Academic Search.
(
www.sciencedirect.com
)
(
www.sciencedirect.com
)