Sign in
Author
|
Conference
|
Journal
|
Organization
|
Year
|
DOI
Look for results that meet for the following criteria:
since
equal to
before
between
and
Search in all fields of study
Limit my searches in the following fields of study
Agriculture Science
Arts & Humanities
Biology
Chemistry
Computer Science
Economics & Business
Engineering
Environmental Sciences
Geosciences
Material Science
Mathematics
Medicine
Physics
Social Science
Multidisciplinary
Keywords
(19)
Chlorophyll Content
Drought Tolerance
Environmental Stress
Field Experiment
Glutamine Synthetase
Growth and Yield
Herbicide Resistance
High Temperature
ipomoea batatas
Low Temperature
Mineral Content
Nutritional Value
Quantum Yield
Sweet Potato
Amino Acid
Free Amino Acid
Fresh Weight
Total Amino Acids
Wild Type
Subscribe
Academic
Publications
Resistance levels and fitness of glufosinate-resistant transgenic sweet potato in field experiments
Resistance levels and fitness of glufosinate-resistant transgenic sweet potato in field experiments,10.1016/j.fcr.2010.12.020,Fuel and Energy Abstract
Edit
Resistance levels and fitness of glufosinate-resistant transgenic sweet potato in field experiments
BibTex
|
RIS
|
RefWorks
Download
J. S. Shin
,
K.-M. Kim
,
D. J. Lee
,
S. B. Lee
,
N. R. Burgos
,
Y. I. Kuk
Transgenic herbicide-resistant
sweet potato
plants [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.] produced through a biolistic transformation were used in this study. The objectives of this research were to (a) quantify resistance levels of transgenic
sweet potato
expressing the bar gene to
glutamine synthetase
(GS)-inhibitors, glufosinate and methionine sulfoximine, protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO)-inhibiting herbicide, oxyfluorfen and photosynthesis-inhibiting herbicide, paraquat; (b) compare the relative chlorophyll content, quantum yield, growth, and tuberous root yield between transgenic and wild-type sweet potato; (c) compare the response of transgenic and wild-type
sweet potato
plants to chilling and high temperature, and (d) compare amino acids, minerals and sugar contents of transgenic and wild-type
sweet potato
tubers. The transgenic
sweet potato
lines were 20–82-fold more resistant to glufosinate than the wild-type. The representative transgenic line 7171 also showed resistance to methionine sulfoximine, but was not resistant to oxyfluorfen and paraquat, which have different target sites. The stem length, number of leaves, petiole length, shoot fresh weight, and storage roots of transgenic lines were lower than those of the wild-type in field experiments. Reduced growth and root yield were not due to reduced
quantum yield
and relative chlorophyll contents. Glufosinate increased the ammonium accumulation in leaves of wild-type plants, but had minimal or no effect on leaves of transgenic line 7171. There were differences in mineral contents, free sugars, total amino acids, and free amino acids in the petiole and storage roots between wild-type and line 7171. There was no difference in
drought tolerance
between wild-type and line 7171, but the transgenic line was more tolerant to chilling temperature than wild-type plants. Follow-up research is required to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the
growth and yield
differences, different nutritional values, and differential response to
low temperature
between wild-type and transgenic sweet potato.
Journal:
Fuel and Energy Abstracts
, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 324-332, 2011
DOI:
10.1016/j.fcr.2010.12.020
Cumulative
Annual
View Publication
The following links allow you to view full publications. These links are maintained by other sources not affiliated with Microsoft Academic Search.
(
www.sciencedirect.com
)