Sign in
Author
|
Conference
|
Journal
|
Organization
|
Year
|
DOI
Look for results that meet for the following criteria:
since
equal to
before
between
and
Search in all fields of study
Limit my searches in the following fields of study
Agriculture Science
Arts & Humanities
Biology
Chemistry
Computer Science
Economics & Business
Engineering
Environmental Sciences
Geosciences
Material Science
Mathematics
Medicine
Physics
Social Science
Multidisciplinary
Keywords
(5)
Atmospheric Pressure
Detoxification
Iron
Pentachlorophenol
Formic Acid
Subscribe
Academic
Publications
Chlorophenol degradation using a one-pot reduction–oxidation process
Chlorophenol degradation using a one-pot reduction–oxidation process,10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.02.017,Applied Catalysis B-environmental,Mohammad S. Yalfan
Edit
Chlorophenol degradation using a one-pot reduction–oxidation process
BibTex
|
RIS
|
RefWorks
Download
Mohammad S. Yalfani
,
Anett Georgi
,
Sandra Contreras
,
Francesc Medina
,
Frank-Dieter Kopinke
Chlorophenol degradation was achieved using a combination of hydrodechlorination and heterogeneous Fenton-like oxidation. The process was conducted at ambient conditions (25±2°C, atmospheric pressure) as a one-pot reaction involving
formic acid
as H2 source for both hydrodechlorination of chlorophenols and H2O2 formation. An alumina-supported Pd–Fe catalyst was applied, which is able to decompose
formic acid
at the Pd sites, forming H2 and CO2, and additionally H2O2 in the presence of O2. At the same time, due to presence of
iron
sites on the catalyst, the H2O2 formed can be utilized for a Fenton-like oxidation reaction. Three different reaction protocols were tested, including: (i) consecutive reduction–oxidation with an initial oxygen-free phase adjusted by He purging (CRO–He), (ii) consecutive reduction–oxidation with initially oxygen-limited conditions (CRO) and (iii) simultaneous reduction–oxidation where O2 flowing was started at the beginning of the reaction (SRO). 2,4-Dichlorophenol (DCP) and
pentachlorophenol
(PCP) were selected as representatives for the group of chlorophenols. For DCP degradation, CRO–He and SRO showed similar efficiencies with respect to the mineralization degree (up to 70%), whereas SRO achieved a better
detoxification
as observed in bioluminescence tests. The CRO–He reaction over the catalyst used showed only a small decrease in its activity during the oxidation stage, with no further change after the catalyst had been recovered twice. For PCP degradation, a self-inhibition effect was observed for the SRO process, indicating that PCP is hardly degradable by catalytic oxidation. In this case, the CRO–He process, which was facilitated by initial transformation of PCP into phenol and its subsequent oxidation, clearly produced a cleaner medium. This was also confirmed by the results of the toxicity measurements. The catalyst indicated a promising stability based upon the Pd and Fe leaching results measured at the end of each run.
Journal:
Applied Catalysis B-environmental - APPL CATAL B-ENVIRON
, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 161-168, 2011
DOI:
10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.02.017
Cumulative
Annual
View Publication
The following links allow you to view full publications. These links are maintained by other sources not affiliated with Microsoft Academic Search.
(
www.sciencedirect.com
)